Section Seven and the Right to Die: A Critical Analysis of the Issue of Doctor-Assisted Suicide in Canada

Authors

  • Christopher Ford

Abstract

This research project attempts to answer the question of whether or not those who are terminally ill, of sound mind, and have a physical disability preventing them from taking their own life should have the moral and legal right to assisted dying in Canada, if they so choose. The study reviews how the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms (1982) and the Criminal Code of Canada affect the right to die and provides a summary and analysis of two of the most prominent legal cases in Canada related to assisted dying: Rodriguez v. Canada (Attorney General) & British Columbia (Attorney General) [1993], in which ALS sufferer Sue Rodriguez was denied the right to assisted dying, and Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) [2012], in which plaintiff Gloria Taylor, also an ALS sufferer, was the only person in Canada to be granted a constitutional exemption to seek out assistance in dying—a case later referred to the Supreme Court of Canada. The research project also offers a moral analysis of assisted death from a variety of perspectives and scholarly backgrounds. It concludes by appealing to the Dutch example, in which assisted death is legalized and heavily regulated, and calls for a change to recognize the right to die.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ford, C. (2017). Section Seven and the Right to Die: A Critical Analysis of the Issue of Doctor-Assisted Suicide in Canada. Revue YOUR Review (York Online Undergraduate Research), 3, 133. Retrieved from https://yourreview3.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/yourreview/article/view/40434

Issue

Section

Abstracts & Posters